by Faith Eckler
Word Ways, 1979
Notice: This article is written under unusual linguistic (lipogram-like) constraints (revealed in final paragraph).
Challenge: Find its modus operandi.
In your youth, there were sure-fire techniques for determining where relationships with persons of opposite gender were going. You would write out his or her moniker. Striking out letters in common, reciting "love, marriage, friendship, hatred" over letters which remained, you learned whether you were heading for matrimony or another outcome. However, supposing this resulted in unpleasant verdicts. You could try full appellations instead. More auspicious results might occur. If this didn't work, you would try abbreviations, etcetera, until you were satisfied. Desired predictions would usually derive from using proper variants of his or your full cognomen.
This kind of juggling of facts for desired results is reminiscent of techniques employed in numerology. Substituting numbers 1 through 26 for letters in alphabetical order, words are manipulated arithmetically, thereby producing marvelous discoveries.
Several different arithmetic techniques are available. First, consider straight addition like in this example:
GIRL = 8 + 9 + 18 + 12 = 47, 4 + 7 = 11. 1 + 1 = 2
Or multiplication in every instance (ignoring zeroes):
GIRL = 8x9x18x12 = 15552, 1x5x5x5x2 = 250, 2x5 = 10, 1
Finally, multiplication with subsequent addition:
GIRL = 8x9x18x12 = 15552, 1 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 2 = 18, 1 + 8 = 9
Presto! Three different magic numbers for this word, proving anything you wish.
Is Gail compatible with Larry? Using (1) addition only, (2) multiplication only, (3) multiplication with addition:
GAIL = 7 + 1 + 9 + 12 = 29, 2 + 9 = 11, 1 + 1 = 2
LARRY = 12 + 1 + 18 + 18 + 25 = 74, 7 + 4 = 11, 1 + 1 = 2
GAIL = 7x1x9x12 = 756, 7x5x6 = 210, 2x1 = 2
LARRY = 12x1x18x18x25 = 97200, 9x7x2 = 126, 1x2x6 = 12, 1x3 = 2
GAIL = 7x1x9x12 = 756, 7 + 5 + 6 = 18, 1 + 8 = 9
LARRY = 12x1x18x18x25 = 97200. 9 + 7 + 2 = 18, 1 + 8 = 9
Three identical pairs: obviously soul-mates!
Would you like lucky numbers for yourself? Nothing simpler--merely figure out numerical values for different legal variations of your title:
Faith Lorraine Eckler 1
F. W. Eckler 2
Faith Woodward Eckler 3
Faith W. Eckler 4
Faith Lorraine Woodward Eckler 5
F. Eckler 6
Mrs. F. W. Eckler 7
Faith Eckler 8
Mrs. Faith W. Eckler 9
In every instance I merely performed simple substitution of numbers for letters with addition of successive digits. Unfortunately, nothing appears uniquely auspicious.
Supposing I try multiplying numbers first, using addition in succeeding operations. I usually sign letters Faith W. Eckler. This works out 6x1x9x20x8x23x5x3x11x12x5x18 = 3541190400 = 27 = 9. Sometimes, I write simply Faith Eckler = 153964800 = 36 = 9, or perhaps F. W. Eckler = 2459160 = 27 = 9. Absolutely amazing patterns begin emerging! All nines! Still more amazing, every component of this moniker yields nine if manipulated in this fashion: Mrs. = 4446 = 18 = 9. Faith = 8640 = 18 = 9, Lorraine = 77565600 = 36 = 9, Woodward = 34279200 = 27 = 9, Eckler = 17820 = 18 = 9. Surely I'm uniquely favored, perhaps worthy of special reverence or adoration.
Actually, this is completely unamazing. It utilizes simple arithmetic principles which appear in "casting out nines" multiplication checks. Every time you multiply strings of numbers which include nine or which include numbers with multiples of nine for their product, you will inevitably find nine resulting from such processes. Confused? I illustrate with several example:
1x9x1x3x2 = 54, 5 + 4 = 9
Nine being present here, nine will result. Or consider:
1x4x5x3x6 = 360, 3 + 6 = 9
Three times six equals eighteen (twice nine), again producing nine for our final answer.
Applying this rule for every component of Mrs. Faith Lorraine Woodward Eckler, you will notice Faith contains I which is alphabetically ninth, while Mrs., Lorraine, Woodward, Eckler all contain R (alphabetically eighteenth, or twice nine). Therefore I could choose every possible variant of this appellation with identical results--nine will occur every single time. Sorrowfully, I conclude there's nothing very special about Faith Eckler.
Is this property I've discussed found very often in English language? In other words, will nine result frequently from manipulating English words in this manner? Surprisingly, large percentages of words exhibit this phenomenon. Examining Merriam-Webster's Pocket Dictionary, I find 196 out of 541 three-letter words (or 36 percent) demonstrate this property, 75 percent of five-letter words together with 98 percent of ten-letter words likewise give this result. Nine is certainly therefore significant for large numbers of words.
You, too, could claim nine for your lucky number if your moniker contains either I or R, or alternatively (common examples in parentheses):
CC (aCCent) FF (gaFFe) LL (aLL) OO (tOO) UU (tUtU) XX
CF (FaCt) FL (FLy) LO (OLd) OU (yOU) UX (tUX)
CL (LaCk) FO (OF) LU (bLUe) OX (bOX)
CO (COve) FU (FUn) LX (LaX)
CU (CUb) FX (FaX)
This numerological property is potentially valuable. You could win wagers in your local bar, betting unknown fellow patrons their surnames equal nine. Analysis of commonest surnames in Social Security records reveal 89 out of 100 people will satisfy proper constraints. (Similarly, only 4 of 34 different presidential surnames fail.) Chances are very high you will win this wager--you could retire rich!
Finally, you could write entire articles for this journal which employ only words exhibiting this property. Quite simple, isnt't it?
Back to Word Ways articles
Back to Word Ways home